Here is a story of what we suggest is clear police and crown corruption in Toronto. Torontonians are in danger from their own negligent or malevolent police force.
You must decide for yourself, as the facts come fast and quick in this following story of what appears to be clear corruption on behalf of the Etobicoke Police and Crown system.
If you are a civil lawyer who would like to take a poke at the Toronto Police or Toronto Crown office.. this case may be of great interest. The facts are all clear and 100% in writing.
This case has
a) No he said/she said (it is unique)
b) This case is 100% in writing (it is unique)
You will see that the Etobicoke Police under the defective leadership of “Timothy Crone”… is dangerous. If you are a law-abiding Toronto Citizen.. you may be in danger from him. You decide.
Let’s begin…
On March 29th, 2019. A mother died.
Here is the written sworn court testimony of Glen Hilborn on that matter, but the date of death is not in question.
It just states that his wife died of dementia on March 29th, 2019
So far so good? Facts seem clear…
Sandra Cirillo called her brother the night her mother died and told him she was going to give him photos, newspapers, and a letter addressed to the defendant from his dead grandmother.
Here is the previous sworn Testimony of Glen Hilborn on this matter. A witness in the pending trial of this case.
His opinion is tainted by the delusion of a habitual abuser, but you can read for yourself what Glen Hilborn swears on this matter.
This is from a court document.
(Upon request, all this information will be emailed to you in full. This content is edited for readability)
Clearly. This is a statement that swears an oath.
That tells us Glen Hilborn and his daughter Sandra Cirillo are in possession of a very personal item.
A letter addressed to him from his dead grandmother. Be sure to read the very last line.
“It was not until the night my wife died…” that the defendant knew of this letter from his dead grandmother.
It seems like the facts are quite clear in the above.
This is very important to remember.
Imagine if you had a beloved mother or grandmother whom you loved like life itself. Then on the night your mother dies, a crazed sibling of yours tells you of the letter and suggests she is sending it to you.
Here is further sworn testimony from Glen Hilborn on that matter.
Again. This sworn statement is from a habitual abuser.
What do we know are the facts so far?
Sandra Cirillo and Glen Hilborn are withholding mail from the dead to the grandson it was addressed to.
Imagine if during your lifetime you write mail to your child or grandchild. What right does another jealous grandchild have to deny you the wish that they may one day read your letter?.
It is not just the defendant being bullied by Domenic Sinopoli and his untrained minions. Domenic Sinopoli is clearly bullying the dead grandmother of the defendant also. If-if-if you think a grandson should be entitled to read what letter/story from his grandmother said. It is reasonable.
This Website is written in September 2021, and this cruel emotional abuse started on March 29, 2019. More than two years this family has been withholding that still unread letter.
So a grandmother has written what was described in text messages to him as a “letter”. The above suggests it is now a “story”. The semantics do not matter. The point is clear.
Now you the reader, must make a decision….
If someone withheld mail (letter/story/anything) from your dead relative that is addressed to you.
is that
a) perfectly fine and normal
b) a little emotionally abusive
c) They are very emotionally abusive, and WTF?
You decide.
Now what would you do if a “depressed” relative was being emotionally abusive and withholding mail from your dead Granny?
Would you
a) say “screw it”, I don’t care what my grandmother wrote?
b) ask for the very personal items
If family members were withholding mail addressed from your beloved dead grandmother… is that emotionally abusive?
The facts of this case are pretty clear….
So… How do The Toronto Police under the befouled leadership of Domenic Sinopoli describe this highly provable and uncontested act.
Let’s look…
Pay attention to the sentence here,
“The accused demanded items from the estate in which he was not entitled to”
Is that how you feel as a casual reader? Do you think a person is “not entitled” to their own mail from a dead relative?
What would you do if you were being denied mail from the dead?
Better question.. what would a reasonable person do if their father and sister were withholding mail from you for spite?
ONE DOLLAR! ONE DOLLAR it would cost to photocopy this letter/story and send it to the grandson recipient. One dollar. Then another dollar could have been used to mail this letter (True or false – you decide). Nobody cares if it is the original letter.. only the words matter.
The grandson had not even spoken to his abusive sister and father in half a decade. The grandson is sickened by his sister and father and their constant abuse. The defendant does not need to paint them as abusers.. you see the sworn facts before you.
This father, sister, and brother are all to be witnesses at the pending trial. They will be thoroughly questioned on everything you see and hear on this webpage.
The Etobicoke crown prosecutors can show this website to all the witnesses.. coach them what to say… but at the end of the day, the truth is clear.
We speak about the letter because the defendant was clearly entitled to it both legally and morally.
Oh.. unless you’re Domenic Sinopoli. Then it is “perfectly reasonable” to bully your siblings or child.
I am willing to wager the majority of Canadians who read this will agree that the grandson was legally and morally entitled to his mail from his grandmother.
(INSERT SURVEY QUESTION Plug-in HERE***** WEBSITE WORK IN PROGRESS**************************************************)
This loving grandson tried to obtain his letter through entirely legal methods, letters to lawyers, talk of court in each and every letter multiple times. The word court was used over 100 times in our communications. One hundred. It’s easy to count words using “word”. So fun fact.
Now Domenic Sinopoli provably knew all of this information prior to the wrongful arrest of the grandson in this matter.
Here is a returned mail from one of his minions which proves Domenic Sinopoli and DC Hudson Norrie were 100% aware of all the facts of this case prior to what we suggest is clearly a wrongful arrest (any tort lawyers want a legal poke at Domenic Sinopoli?.. contact email above)
Here is proof of that… When we sue them. We sue them all, and also for malicious prosecution.. (if it is.. you decide).
This is a returned email (proof in a court of receipt), from an email that both DC Hudson Norrie and who we suggest is the incompetent Domenic Sinopoli were copied in (copies sent). Copies to all in a single email replied below by one 11 division staffer.. It was a lengthy email containing all of the facts presented here.
So Domenic Sinopoli can’t pretend he didn’t know of this corruption prior to his wrongfully arresting the defendant. If you agree that the defendant was wrongfully arrested.. read on.. It gets better if you enjoy police corruption.
Notice that the date on the above email was November 23rd. The defendant was wrongfully arrested a week later.
This website will use the term “wrongfully arrested” quite often. You need to decide for yourself.
This website will give all of the evidence they have.. so put on your own detective caps and see if you can outsmart a Toronto Police detective.
Now what would you do to retrieve a letter… from the dead… from a sibling you’d rather avoid because she is abusive.
Abusive: This webpage describes Sandra and Carlo Cirillo as abusers. This website describes the father in this matter as habitually abusive. There is much that the public may not see from this page, but even if we just look at the known testimony and facts so far… they are clearly bullying the defendant. To a high degree.
The defendant’s children are also being exposed to these abusers due to trickery and deceit as will be outlined below. The bully Sandra Cirillo used the lie of being an executor to obtain the address of the defendant’s son in what many people might consider stalking. Impersonated an official (executor) in text writing to obtain the secret address the defendant’s child. Srsly!
So these siblings had a facebook conversation.. a private facebook conversation. It was not public. It was a private message. A DM. Messenger. private.
The message started with the defendant uttering the words… well you can read it…
NOTE: You are only seeing two of 14 images here (readability). If you want the full innocuous conversation. I will post it at the end of this.
This facebook exchange occurred on April 18th, 2019. Two-plus weeks after their mother’s death. The promised letters and newspapers and photos never arrived. Big surprise.
This went on for a dozen photos you can read in full at the end of this webpage. Then ended with the following claim of “Harassment”.
The exchange was gruff and in-tone a collection letter. If someone steals your car, you do not write a “nice” letter asking for it back.. you demand it back. You might even cuss.
This exchange is very important because it proves 100% that the complainant, in this case, has zero clue what harassment or defamation means. Not even close.
Harassment requires reasonable fear of assault. Not reasonable fear of being sued… and every communication they received mentioned court.. including this one.
This facebook exchange is 100% public now… but all participants in what is claimed to be a clearly wrongful arrest chose their actions.. repeatedly.
You can see above Domenic Sinopoli proveably and willfully ignored an email to him that spoke of this case and what we suggest is clear corruption within his ranks. (copies of actual email available for scrutiny as are all of these facts)
Notice the last words of that conversation.
“Stop harassing me”… By Sandra Cirillo. This was over a year and a half prior to the wrongful arrest.
There is no mention of violence or any threats towards her in that exchange. Everything communication was reasonable, legal, and designed to collect a very personal belonging of the defendants (his mail).
Fun fact: It is reasonable for people denied family photos to seek them from aunts, uncles, cousins, relatives. True or false. So some of the conversations devolved into what would the public think of your actions… and you’re hearing this story now.. But her brother did not try to expose her cruelty. He just wanted her to act like a decent human being.
Has anyone here ever used facebook messenger?
If you are offended on Facebook, what do reasonable people do?
You block them correct?
No. In this instance the families have wealth. So instead of blocking her brother as a normal person does. Sandra Cirillo immediately sets a lawyer on her brother. Trump style. Bully bully bully.
How dare her brother ask for mail from his dear beloved grandmother… as most Canadians would think highly reasonable.
So the emotionally abused brother was sitting at home and a knock comes to the door… who could that be?
It was just a few hours after that facebook exchange.. and a lawyer sends a bogus and highly irregular cease and desist letter to the defendant.
Now anybody can write a cease and desist letter. This website is a cease and desist letter to the Etobicoke Crown prosecution to “cease and desist” their corrupt ways… if they are indeed corrupt.. you decide.
So let’s paste that bogus “cease and desist” letter below…
It suggests the defendant was defaming her, threatening her, and generally being an ass.
Which is simply not true. Not according to evidence and things called facts.
The Facebook exchange above finished near noon. Sandra Cirillo had hired a lawyer, drafted this letter and had it couriered over 30km to the defendant’s doorstep. All before 4 pm that same afternoon. She could have sent the defendant his legal belongings for much less. Sandra Cirillo is the bully of bullies. Donald Trump has nothing on Sandra Cirillo.
This is an uncontested fact. Sandra and Carlo Cirillo hold the defendants UNREAD mail to this very day. Two and a half years later. They keep doubling down on bullying and emotional abuse. Sandra and Carlo Cirillo are forced to be witnesses in court.. while in fact they are still heavily bullying the defendant. Long before this the defendant gave up on that letter and switched his aims at preventing further crimes and abuse to the defendant’s children. Sandra Cirillo impersonated an executor by texting the words “I am the executor” to the defendant while demanding the previously secret address of his children. Is that stalking? You decide. That is how she obtained access to the defendants children. Uncontestable. This is just “historical”.
Remember. The Police and crown have no witnesses who have even seen the defendant in over half a decade. There are five witnesses at the pending February trial, and none of them have seen the defendant in at least half a decade. Sooooo if-if-if a non-legal threat occurred that warranted the above cease and desist. It would have to be in the written messages sent by the defendant (true or false).
The Toronto Police and Crown do not need things like facts and truth or even laws to orchestrate an arrest nowadays.
They just point at you now and you’re guilty. The people in Toronto need to fear the incompetent Domenic Sinopoli’s.
You will hear from what we suggest are deranged prosecutors such as Laurie Gonet. You need to decide for yourself if you think she has competence.
Let’s update the actual “synopsis”. Let’s forget the police fiction for now.
a) We have sworn testimony that the father and sister are severe emotional abusers of not just the defendant, but his children are also the victims of their bullying grandfather and aunt/uncle.
b) The defendant says he will send her a stamp if she cannot afford to send a photocopy..
C) she sends a bogus cease and desist.
If-if-if your sibling was withholding a letter from your dead relative addressed to you, and your sibling sent you a bogus unmerited cease and desist letter via courier. How would you respond?
Of course you would give up on your letter. I mean. its normal to not want your own mail.. right?
That is of course facetious. Everyone alive who is moral and decent would deliver mail from the dead to the very person it is addressed to.
Asking for items that legally belong to you is one hundred percent warranted.
Imagine you stole someone’s car. They have a right to email you ten thousand times and ask for their car back. The thief assumed a “voluntarily assumption of risk” (legal term) that the victim may want their car back. You cant whine because they are sending you emails.
So this “cease and desist” had zero merits. This is a strong and clear opinion.. but all fourteen images of that conversation that led to the cease and desist are at the end of this webpage. It is clear and evident the brother was trying to obtain a letter from his grandmother using normal conversation.
Some of that conversation used foul language.. but these are siblings.. and one of them is being an asshole here. You decide which one. The provable bully or her brother victim (the defendant).
Now imagine a lawyer sent you a cease and desist letter after you had the audacity to ask for your stolen car back.
Would you forget about your car?… Keep it sister.
or
Would you still want to read the letter written to you by your dead relative that you love?
But you were sent a bogus cease and desist by a lawyer who must have spent all of ten minutes learning the “facts”. We do not know how long it took to hire this lawyer, draft this bogus letter, and have it couriered over 30 km. In a matter of hours. Had Sandra Cirillo chosen then to do the right thing, you would not be reading this provable truth about her today.
If someone stole your car and then sent you a bogus cease because you asked for it back.
Would you be scared away from getting your car back? Would you let them simply keep your beloved car?
I say a stolen car is something people would want back as an example. Many, many, many people think it is highly reasonable to think a letter from a dead relative that you loved dearly.. is worth more than any car.
Would you rather have a brand new Tesla car, or a letter from someone you loved who passed away?
The answer you give is personal. Many people think differently from the Etobicoke Crown Laurie Gonet.
You decide.
The defendant did not have any address for his sister. They were a normal-ish family. There was never any rude behavior between the two. Never ever.
Sandra Cirillo, Carlo Cirillo, the abusive father… none of these people have been with the defendant in an unwitnessed scenario for the past thirty years. Not once has the defendant even acted rudely towards any of them. They are the provable assholes. Not the defendant.
They enjoyed a decent relationship.. until the night their mother died when she joined her father in this emotional abuse.
The crown prosecutor cannot name a single instance where the defendant has ever hit anyone or acted untowardly. Never, ever, ever…. the defendant is clearly a saint on paper. The defendant is trained in martial arts but has never been seen to use these skills by anyone known here.
Clearly the above “cease and desist” was improper.
Would it stop you from obtaining your stolen car back?
So the defendant, without the address of his sister, replied to what appeared to be a very incompetent lawyer. he should have sat his client down and said.. hey.. give back the stolen car… or letter.
In short; Bisceglia and Associates could have easily told Sandra and Carlo Cirillo to stop being such dicks.
This is a copy of the exact words sent back to that lawyer on which date?
Notice it does contain foul language.. as is reasonable if you’ve been following along. These letters are purposefully meant to carry an angry tone. These are COLLECTION LETTERS. When bill collectors come to your door they are not polite or friendly.. they demand what is theirs.
This is also a civil matter between this brother and sister. The Police involved themselves in a civil matter to sway the odds and help the bullying. You decide… Much corruption will be unveiled (opinion).
This letter was also provably sent on April 18th, 2019. This is the third exchange from that date. It would cost $1 to photocopy and $1 to send her brother his mail, only the words matter. It’s now September 2021 already. Where’s the beef? How sick are these individuals to withhold mail from the dead to the very grandson the mail is addressed to? After years (plural). You decide.
This is a letter you might reasonably send to a lawyer who appears to be off his noodle, reserve some judgments until you hear more.
Remember.. all this sister had to do was photocopy the letter and mail it with a stamp… all this extra drama… is on them, the corrupt police and the corrupt crown prosecution (you decide.. actual facts are plentiful and coming)
Even the police and crown were given ample warning that their actions will one day be known nationwide. They chose to be on this webpage. They all owned their false truths.
The defendant didn’t even know at the time if the lawyer was reading the emails. We would not allow my lawyer to read random emails. We would only instruct lawyers to read what is legally served to them. However, in Wally world.. Sandra Cirillo seemed to allow Emilio Biosceglia (of Bisceglia and Associates) to read and discuss these emails… We have proof she let the lawyer read the emails.. and that they laughed at them and ignored them.
If only we had proof… Oh wait… of course we do.
“Emilio” in those text exchanges is her lawyer through context and direct statements.
So the defendant is reasonably trying to obtain a letter addressed to him from his beloved dead grandmother
(cannot make shit like this up),
and Emilio of Emilio and Associates and his client… think emotional abuse is humourous. Sandra Cirillo may not be competent enough to spell the name of her own school or her lawyer, but the words are clear.
Remember… “Voluntary assumption of risk”. If you withhold a letter from a beloved dead relative from the person it is addressed to.. that’s pretty mean.
There are entire movies about strangers who move mountains to deliver letters from the dead, and here we have Bisceglia and Associates and Sandra and Carlo Cirillo, quadrupling down on what to everyone sane is clear emotional abuse.
Let’s look at some other texts she sent that day…
Remember.. all this sister had to do was photocopy the $1 photocopy and mail it with a $1 stamp… all this extra drama… is on them.
Were they too afraid to photocopy a letter from their grandmother and mail it at any mailbox? Would there be any risk to their safety even if their clearly false allegations had any merit? The sworn testimony at the start of this thread stated “It is my understanding [the defendant]would have received these ITEMS [plural], but he started harassing my daughter”.
Sandra Cirillo, who claimed in writing to be the “executor” of this estate could not safely go to a photocopy machine and then to a mailbox at the cost of two dollars? Even if the defendant was nefarious (he’s not). There is no sane reason she could not deliver the letter from the dead to the addressee. Period! (you decide)
Would you have done the right thing?
How many thousands and thousands of your taxpayer dollars have been spent on small claims court, a highly illegal arrest without any justifications (opinion based on “reality”), and countless court dates and prosecution.. Your taxpayer dollars at work. How many thousands and thousands of your taxpayer dollars will go to the future of this case?
We have further proof, but here is just one text from Sandra Cirillo clearly acknowledging that she received all of the defendant’s legal emails through her lawyer. Through her lawyer (not one mail to her directly).
Here is a text from Sandra Cirillo to the defendant.
Notice the words “Emilio, and lawyer here”
These are a few photos of words typed by Sandra Cirillo. The abuser (not opinion.. clear fact). Texted in writing. For posterity. These are “Historical documents“. Truth and publishable forever.
Notice that Sandra Cirillo.. the accuser in this matter and now a person who ridiculously claims to fear for her safety. Has no qualms about calling her brother bad names. “Stupid” in above, etc., “idiot” in the text before that, “loser” three texts up.
Let’s be clear.. she knows how to hurl foul language herself.
Much of these exchanges are between siblings…
We suggest that in the days of CCTV and legalized Marijuana. The Toronto Police have run out of criminals.. and must attack innocents to make their “quotas” (another topic). Police do not have a quota system but a detective that never arrests anyone may not last long on the job. No profit. Domenic Sinopoli needs bodies in his cells.. innocent or not.
For now.. we will toss in a few more of her provable text messages.
Written historical documents. Facts won’t change just because the police and crown want to avoid culpability here.
Stay tuned.. we haven’t even gotten to the corruption yet! (if you think its corruption that is.. we only list the facts)
(NOTE: FIX PHOTO DIRECTION WEBSITE WORK IN PROGRESS *********************************************)
The above text message suggests that the defendant was never legally entitled to a letter addressed to him from his beloved dead grandmother.
The defendant did not write the words, “Nowhere does it say you were entitled to these items”… That was his weird sister.
and congratulations.. now you have a good understanding of Sandra and Carlo Cirillo.. provable assholes both.
That is if-if-if you think a jealous grandchild withholding mail from another grandchild is in any way “assholish”. We suggest you decide for yourself.
This was quite a lengthy text exchange.. four months before the police became involved. Four months after their mother’s death
The defendant could have published all of this legally back then.. and should have. This is true, and that is not defamation.. ever.
Here is the theme…. remember it, please.
We cannot change history.
Sandra and Carlo Cirillo along with the defendant’s father cannot be described as anything but abusers if you want to label them correctly.
“They should have behaved better”…
This now applies to what this website strongly suggests is corrupt Toronto Police and corrupt Toronto Prosecutors. We have full proof they are corrupt.. but they hold the handcuffs so we must tread lightly when insulting police or crown.. They do not mind arresting innocents (opinion).
After the publication of this website the defendant almost expects the incompetent Domenic Sinopoli to send his goon squads to arrest him yet again for no valid reason.
This website does speak about all the witnesses in this matter. It is not witness intimidation to imply the “witnesses” (none who have seen the defendant in many years minimum) may need to speak the truth upon the witness stand… because we know their truth. You will learn what each witness must say if you just keep reading. There is already too much evidence against Etobicoke Crown (they keep sending more), so we are trying to be concise.
Already you have seen a lengthy sworn statement from the child abuser “Glen Hilborn”, and his fellow abusers Sandra Cirillo and Carlo Cirillo. They are provably abusing the defendant and his children even if they withheld a single photo.. and many photos in that house were the defendant’s property.
One example: The defendant’s ex-common-law-wife had a fire destroy her home. She would love videos that the defendant had taken and stupidly left in the care of his parents. Nope. You need better siblings and father if you want that stuff. The defendant’s son would love to present his mother with videos from her youth. No.. You would need decent family.
Now when the defendant first began sending emails (also with return cussing.. a sibling cuss fest is normal in some families.. it does not imply violent intents.)
As you can see above the defendant’s sister loves cussing at him.
The defendant just wanted his belongings and for her to vamoose. There is not a single communication that did not involve the mail (letter/story), or administering oversight should these cruel monsters actually have positions of bullying as future executors. As any reasonable parent would do to protect their children from these provably abusive creeps.
Let’s just look at a few more text exchanges between the bully Sandra Cirillo and the defendant.
Let’s see if you can see if the court was mentioned here… For the police were involved shortly afterward.. six months later.
Did Sandra Cirillo purposefully (intent) mislead the Etobicoke Police and the Etobicoke Crown Laurie Gonet and create an illegal police report? You decide. Keep reading.
Okay.. so let’s look at a few text messages from the defendant to his nutty and bully sister.
Notice in this exchange (CORRECT DIRECTION LATER NEED PLUGIN***********************)
Notice in this exchange the defendant can be directly quoted as saying “I am not supposed to talk with you, let’s leave it for the courts.”
Note: The defendant was always allowed to talk to his sister.. even now. The police conducted an illegal arrest based on a fudged warrant (strong opinion based on reality). So if the defendant did contact his sister or ignore this wrongful arrest entirely it would be 100% legal.
Read below, the defendant just wanted all communications on record. The defendant is clever that way. That is why this case has zero “he said/she said, the lifeblood of the corrupt Toronto Police and prosecution.
“You’re”.. not “your”.
That is the defendant saying “Let’s leave it for the courts”… The defendant is fairly confident that any sane person can see that Sandra Cirillo is truly an ass. So leaving it for the courts was and is prudent.
The court was mentioned 95 times in the 100% legal letters sent to Sandra and Carlo Cirillo through their lawyer Emilio Bisceglia. The court was mentioned many times elsewhere including the above-written text and phone call exchange. well over one hundred times court was mentioned as a remedy within a single year.
But the corrupt investigators and crown have a weirdo synopsis… a synopsis that doesn’t even mention court.. The court is not even mentioned once in their highly fictional synopsis. That is piss poor investigation or corruption.
*************************** correct photo direction******************
Notice this is 100% proof in a statement Sandra Cirillo was texted in historical writing.
This is clear proof that Sandra Cirillo was phoning the defendant “REPEATEDLY”… on August 6, 2019.
“but you kept hanging up on me” – The defendant kept hanging up on his crazy sister.
What date was that bogus cease and desist letter she had sent? Clearly almost four full months earlier on April 18th, 2019.
So on one hand we have a bogus “cease and desist”… to start with.. (correct?.. you decide), and four months later she is ringing the defendant’s phone.. off the bloody hook.
It is Sandra Cirillo who is harassing the defendant in the above exchange… The defendant had cause to fear for his family’s safety around physical and emotional child abusers.
She says “you’re scared” in the above text because she kept phoning and phoning and phoning and phoning.. and the defendant refused all calls.
look at this…
All yellow conversation is from the saintly defendant. All blue text is from the crazy abusive sister. You may be tempted to confuse.. because the police arrested the innocent here.. as you will soon see.
If you see “crazy talk” in this exchange.. it is from the abusive complainant in this matter.
Now.. four months after the cease and desist bullcrap… the crazy depressed nutjob abuser sister is doing what?
Phoning the defendant repeatedly. She has texted him since his wrongful arrest even.
In the eyes of SANE lawyers (not Etobicoke police or crown), would repeatedly phoning someone nullify a previous cease and desist no-contact order? Even if that bogus cease and desist had any legal merit? The synopsis speaks about the bullcrap cease and desist as if it was a bonified court order. No stupid Etobicoke police.. It was never a court order. Morons.
Why did the corrupt police even mention that bullcrap “cease and desist” in their fictional synopsis?.. idiocy.
This entire exchange was started by a request for the name of her lawyer on record. The defendant did not even know what city his sister lived in.. he hasn’t seen her in many years.
To sue someone you need an address or a lawyer’s name for service. The only address we had was for the asshole abusive husband of Sandra Cirillo.. who is the husband and the accomplice of the abusive sister.
Here are a few more text exchanges. Yellow = sane… Blue = dialogue from his insane asylum sister, the crazy talk.. the complainant in this matter. In all fairness, Sandra Cirillo has not been locked inside an insane asylum for decades.
Sandra Cirillo the bully abuser here, has most definitely been locked inside an insane asylum though. We think her bullying is part of some undisclosed mental illness. The same cannot be said for Domenic Sinopoli. His negligence was willful.
As you can see clearly in this historically documented statement by Sandra Cirillo… the defendant was wanting of a service address.
No valid service address was achieved that day. Just drama from Sandra Cirillo.
Remember.. Sandra and Emilio just “laugh and don’t respond” according to her previous historical testimony.
What can you do when you live in a shoe?
(correct photo *******************************************)
She begged the defendant to pick up the phone teasing an address for service. if only the defendant would pick up the phone and listen to her whining. and moaning and drama. It’s history.
The defendant refused to speak to her off the record.
Listen to this “PREDICTION” six months before police involvement… The defendant must be a psychic.
The defendant suggested to his sister’s face, that she is the type to attack without provocation. This was in August.. six months before Sandra Cirill, Carlo Cirillo, and the defendants father, attacked him without any provocation. Nailed it.
Words are words.. this is a true text exchange and verifiable. Sandra Cirillo and her husband Carlo Cirillo are going to be interrogated about their actions on the witness stand currently scheduled for February.
Now.. By this time the defendant just didn’t want his twisted sister abusing the kids further.
All future efforts were aimed at gaining “oversight” should Sandra Cirillo truly become the executor as she is scheduled to be.
Imagine you are a reasonable person: Would YOU want your own children exposed to the future executor whims of an ass who cannot even deliver a letter from her own dead grandmother to the very person it is addressed to… Sandra Cirillo would have a seriously hard time distributing anything in a sane manner (you decide).
Would you try to protect your children from their physical and emotional abuses (plural)? This is “reasonable”.
This even escalated to wanting her barred from such executor roles (for sanity).. but they keep escalating.. at your taxpayer expense.
So before the defendant sues them in what would cost them 5% of a five million dollar estate (Over $250 000 – these monies are guesstimates). Sandra Cirillo and Carlo Cirilo currently stand to earn 5% of that estate just for there executor roles.. which is fine.. if they can act sane… The defendant tried to reason with them. The defendant TRIED to reason with them, the police, crown. Before you remove someone from a job that pays $250 000 you want to ATTEMPT some dialogue. That is how reasonable people act.
In attached letters sent to the Cirillos through Bisceglia and associates, the defendant started asking for a $500 monthly donation to the Toronto Humane Society. The defendant knew that his crazy sister and her abuser asshole of a husband might be more inclined to be decent humans if they were facing penalties for their bullying behaviours…
The sister and her lawyer “We just laugh and don’t respond”
(previous text posted above)
$500 monthly is apparently, not a penalty big enough penalty to encourage the sister who had so much-inherited wealth.
That amount grew. The defendant always said Toronto humane Society. The preferred charity of their dead mother. or else these assholes will say it is about money. It is about human decency.. nothing more.
This letter to her husband is harsh.. but if the Toronto Police and crown started acting sanely in this matter.. then the defendant can continue to sue his asshole sister and have her removed as future executor.
We will show you using “evidence” that Sandra Cirillo made a clearly illegal police complaint where some facts were “fudged”. Keep reading.
You are going to see many errors from police.. keep reading.
The defendant had spoken mainly to Bisceglia and Associates… Did Sandra Cirillo even tell her husband about the situation?
The defendant is a super nice guy.. he did not want to cost his sister $250 000 in lost executor fees.. thats a fair chunk of change for some families.
So… just prior to having them removed entirely as executors.. The defendant wrote a harsh but completely legal collection letter.
Here is an excerpt.. It went on for over a dozen pages. he got the full story.
Now.. pay attention to two “threats” the police see in the above.
The letter had had said, “Come here asshole.. fighting is allowed if consensual.”
The defendant had also threatened to wait until his children were adults before he petitioned them for family photos.. OOOH.. how scary and evil is the defendant must be (facetiousness).. waiting until their children are of age before asking them for his legal belongings.
Now saying “Come here”, is an invitation. true or false.
The defendant did not say he was going to come to Carlo and ask for a consensual fight? It was an invite.. and consent was required.
This was also bravado. Carlo Cirillo has spent over a dozen years working for the Ontario beer store. He is not unused to bravado.
However.. I wish to point out that consensual fights are what every boxing match-up is.
This is Canada where Canadian laws should apply.
Let’s look if consensual fights are legal in Canada.
Mind you.. this fight never occurred.. only talk of it. B-R-A-V-A-D-O.
(remember to open outside links in a new window if you’re enjoying this story about police and corruption)
https://www.yyccriminaldefence.ca/street-fight-consent/
This word “consent” is the difference between legal and non-legal.
If you said “Come here, fighting is allowed if consensual” to someone and they went to The Toronto Police and claimed you threatened them…should you be arrested without question. Without question. Ask any boxer.
Let’s now start looking at the police actions…
The defendant stated, “consent” in his letter… and the word “consensual” and the word “permission”.
Now on top of everything else..
Sandra and Carlo had just received an email from the defendant (through their lawyer Bisceglia and associates of course). The defendant sent Carlo one letter to update him, but he switched back to emailing her lawyer
Here is a provable historical email message sent through Bisceglia and associates to Sandra and Carlo Cirillo.
EXACTLY ONE WEEK before police were involved.
A donation of $50 000 was mentioned here to the Toronto Humane Society if they wished to apologize and do the right thing. Remember, $500 per month lit zero fires under these inherited wealth child abusers.
So… We are pretty much done with the synopsis of what truly occurred according to actual “facts”.
So what is the “police” and crown version of events?
Question: Is it “corrupt” to suggest in open court as Etobicoke Crown fucknut Laurie Gonet has stated.
“The accused had also sent threatening letters to Carlo indicating that he was going to beat him up and punch his face in”
Excuse us?
Is it moral or even legal for crown prosecutors to lie so blatantly in open court.
We are not lawyers here, but there seems to be a very huge difference between
a statement like ,
“I promise I won’t hurt you too badly if you give consent”, “I can beat the crap out of you if you give consent”..
is NOT the same as crown prosecutor Laurie Gonet’s fiction.
HISTORY! This is now a historical document. The crown Laurie Gonet cannot just pull her own convenient un-facts from her anus.
There should be some grounding in reality… at least a bare minimum.
************************* ADD SURVEY QUESTION HERE (WEBSITE IN PROGRESS) *************
Do you think Laurie Ann Gonet is corrupt for stating such bold lies in open court. Should a prosecutor be allowed to leave out the words “consent”, “consensual” and “permission”?
To alter facts to their fancy.
(Question is Laurie Gonet corrupt)
The word “consent” made that letter legal… If the defendant had said he was going to beat up Carlo and punch his face in, then where is it in writing?
The Toronto Police and crown are completely ignorant of the law. They are so used to “he said/she said” it’s pathetic.
************************************************
Due to incomplete paper disclosure, we are missing the name of whatever fucknut signed the arrest warrant with zero evidence… we need to add surveys and questions about him/her also….
How investigators work under the supervision of the negligent Domenic Sinopoli.
Here is the actual situation.
a) The defendant and his children were being abused by his father and sister/brother… according to their own words and past and future testimony.
b) The defendant warned them… they are going to look like complete assholes if anyone hears of their wickedness. the defendant is not withholding mail from the dead addressed to them.
c) The Cirillos were told January 31st, 2020 that the defendant thought it prudent to simply attend small claims court and ask a sane judge to have them barred entirely from any future roles as executor…
Now maybe a judge would or wouldn’t bar them from being future executors. But court was always the suggested remedy.
The defendant was charged with criminal harassment. This means the prosecution must prove the Cirillo’s had reasonable reason to fear the saintly defendant. Using writing.. no he said she said.
This is why their synopsis looks like it was written by Steven King (fiction author)
PC O’Toole of 22 division which was run under Domenci Sinpoli at the time in question… responded to the complaint
Here are PC O’Tooles actions according to him, in his very own penmanship. If you have legal training or understand the law even slightly. This is the “confession” of PC O’Toole.
These assholes are far too used to “he said/she said”. None of the alleged victims have even seen the defendant in over half a decade.
The confession of PC O’Toole, a fucknut under the leadership of the incompetent Domenic Sinopoli.
Yes.. you read it correctly I imagine…
This officer bought the twisted sisters sob story hook, line, and sinker.
Notice the HISTORICAL statement above (preserved for fifty years on this website alone),
“PC O’Toole calls Keith and advises him to not contact the above parties, Keith becomes enraged and hangs up”.
Question:
It contains a swearword.. be prepared.
Question: Who the fuck does that fucktard of a cop PC O’Toole think he is inventing his own set of laws. No crime was ever committed.
Imagine you are suing someone in Toronto. All they have to do is phone a minion of Domenic Sinopoli and they can have you arrested for no reason.
Does the above state,
“I phoned Keith to investigate this matter?”
Does it show any effort to obtain any evidence.. any at all?
No.. It is a confession that states clearly…He was warning the defendant off his civil case.
One day the defendant is set to file a claim in small claims court.. next thing Domenic Sinoplois assholes are full on the tail of this clearly innocent man. Harassing him and putting his life at risk. Imagine being hauled out of quarantine on the night your wife died and came back from a stroke on in December 2020. The peak of the pandemic.
No. This campaign against the corrupt police and crown has just begun. When I sue the police and crown I will give them a bargain if no NDA. This story needs to be told for decades.
Because that is how Toronto Police have learned to investigate nowadays. Domenic Sinopoli is a dangerous and serious threat to the Toronto people. Be forewarned. Toronto is not safe for law-abiding citizens.
The defendant.. not being an utter moron. Knew that he had broken no laws.. not even close.
The defendant tried to explain to PC O’Toole that the word “consent” is what made that letter legal. Not our fault police under Domenic Sinopoli are clueless of things like “laws”. You would think crown attorney fucknut Laurie Gonet would understand the law here. but Noooo… They love prosecuting innocents.. Maybe they get more points in some sick twisted game called “who can send the most innocents to jail”
Laurie Gonets past and future actions are clear, obvious, and to be fully documented. Obviously, she is still attacking the clearly innocent defendant (she needs to ask a real lawyer how laws work) so we shall not be speaking kindly of her.. ever. Some people are irredeemable in their loss of morality.
But this weirdo PC O’Toole was insistent in what was factually a returned call with a female dispatcher and this entire conversation on MP3. After PC O’Toole is interrogated during the three-day pending trial in February.. we will add a Youtube video of PC O’Toole and the defendant talking. It and several other MP3’s cannot be posted until after they all testify.
What is PC O’Toole going to say UNDER OATH?.. That he did investigate.. when clearly he asked no questions.
Can you imagine how incompetent a cop must be to simply arrest people, no questions asked… and there is no “smoking gun” or crime here.
But… he did not arrest… he only “warned” the defendant. Without merit or cause.
No… No, no, no, no, no. Fuck his illegal warnings.
The police are supposed to follow laws.. not manufacture convenient un-facts from their anus.
The defendant had broken no laws… PC O’Toole quotes things like that bogus “cease and desist” order. The one nullified by repeated, repeated, repeated phone calls from his nutjob sister.
Remember how many times the defendant had to hang up on the crazy lady. A lot.
Is this a FUCKING JOKE! Excuse the language, but is this a fucking joke.
That is not the defendant’s writing above. That is a direct quote from the illegal synopsis put forth by the corrupt crown prosecutors (if you think its corrupt and illegal to remove words like “consent” from a synopsis read aloud in court)
You the public have seen why the Cease and desist letter was BOTH silly to begin with and nullified by the repeated, repeated phone calls. The defendant was forced to hang up on her. She hid caller ID’s.. nutjob.
Yes.. we have seen the “cease and desist” letter (above) from April 18th. The one sent over the facebook exchange where Mrs Cirillo verified to us all, she was clueless to the definition of both Harassment and defamation. What kind of advice was Bisceglia and associates feeding these abusers.
So in the synopsis let’s look at a few HUGE obvious lies.
a) The synopsis claimed falsely, defendant would “beat him up and punch his face in”
Prosecution and police should not get points for creativity. The defendant clearly used the words “consent” consensual” and permission in that single letter (not letters plural) to Carlo.
Laurie Gonet the (we suggest) corrupt crown prosecutor (opinion), knows all the facts of this case and she is on the side of these wackjob cops and their weirdo synopsis. She has acknowledged receipt of this entire story.. told time and again, but she is still prosecuting a clearly innocent person.
I can legally tell this story online because it is all truth. Defamation requires it to be false. Truth is always the best defense against defamation.
I don’t tell lies. Really.
Toronto Police act like the defendant is a criminal here.. but they are the guilty parties here.
Now remember some of the actual facts surrounding this case.
a) The defendant and his children were being abused. No contention. The abusers MUST swear to it in court.
b) The cease and desist letter was invalid and silly.
c) The defendant had no address for service but Carlo’s workplace. Had the abusers given any other address where the discussions were not laughed at and ignored.
d) The defendant was “reasonable” in wanting his mail from the dead.
e) The accuser would tease addresses and then never give one.. An address is needed for court service and Bisceglia and Associates was not a lawyer on record. The crazy bitch forced communication.
f) The accusers were handed a $250 000 motive to lie exactly seven days (SEVEN DAYS = 1 WEEK) before the police were involved.
e) The sister never had power of attorney over their very healthy father. Why PC O’Toole kept mentioning that craziness is beyond sanity.
So.. were the Cirillo’s afraid of the defendant attacking them without consent? OR, OR, OR.. were they afraid of losing $250 000 for being jackasses.
The testimony from the defendant’s father in a previous court case pretty much tanks the prosecution case… but they love prosecuting innocents. I’d wager 1/3 of all people in Toronto jails have never done anything wrong. Toronto justice is not fair like on TV. Do not let “Law and Order’ make you think Toronto prosecutors are moral.
Sandra Cirillo, Carlo Cirillo, and Glen Hilborn the father… are all going to testify to the truth as stated in writing here.
There is so much evidence we are leaving out for readability.
As soon as PC O’Toole finished his “brilliant” (facetous) detective work. Sandra Cirillo emailed her brother with yet another cease and desist.
and due to the corruption of 11 and 22 division cops.. She may get away with her bullying.
So The defendant responded to his sister with the following email,.. coming soon after the next paste
This is what the moron cops suggest is the “illegal” email. The defendant didn’t just mail it. It was in response to an email he had received an hour earlier from his bullying counterparts.
Read the above… and now look for yourself at this “illegal” (according to Etobicoke Crown) scathing email that caused all the fuss.
I mean.. READ IT PLEASE! Sure the defendant swore.. it was his nutjob sister not a stranger. A sister who can heave insults herself.
Swearing is not illegal.. please tell Toronto Police.
This was a private email.. We didn’t publish it until now… this is the “scathing email” in full. Enjoy!
This letter caused the arrest (fun fact).
Then it continued…
Can you see the reason for the defendants wrongful arrest in that “scathing” email. No. None. Except that it broke the illegal commandment of fucktard PC O’Toole of 22 division. A fucktard who surprisingly is not supposed to invent his own laws. Google it. Police are supposed to follow laws, not invent them.
So… has anyone else seen threats in the defendant’s letters or texts so far? You will never find any of you look at every single word… and I’d wager Laurie Gonet is throwing a legal assistant at just that so she can misquote and obsfucate.
If a prosecutor goes into court and says “he said he was going to beat him up and punch his face in”.. even without the proof it is damaging to the defendant’s case. That is corruption plain and simple. You should win cases on merits. and not because you can block the most evidence or obfuscate but we will document all of her actions for you.
Look at the above date. February 7th was when PC O’Toole illegally manufactured his own set of laws from his anus.
The accused was cautioned… and we would like to add “fuck you” to that officer for his clearly fucked up way of conducting an investigation. It has caused much pain and suffering to innocents
a) Nowhere in this entire synopsis does it mention court, how did an “investigator” not know there was a civil suit ongoing.
b) How come the “investigator” not report the $250 000 motive the Cirillo’s had for lying.
I mean.. there is proof in an email (show full emails and photos to ALL who ask. Press or Tort lawyers)
Look at the DATE on this email that says the defendant wants Sandra Cirillo removed as the executor.. he only wanted oversight.. but this was after almost a full year of her assholeness.
Notice the date is January 31st. PC O’Toole warned me away on February 7th… Fact!
The Cirillo’s had a $250 000 motive to feign fear. (Just the facts – read it yourself.)
The words court and judges.. and wow.. so much…..
Let’s look at this fucked up synopsis from Domenic Sinopoli once again.. for the chuckle (but real harm has been done – see damages further down)
In February, 2022 we are going to be ridiculing the entire synopsis and we still don’t know what jackass signed its warrant without a shred of viable evidence. **************** change this after we learn corrupt tjudge who signed warrant ***************** Website a work in progress.
NOTE: To be fair.. We will edit in comments from the corrupt prosecution and the corrupt police in this case. if they wish to defend their insane methodology.
We are just documenting it all…
If you are a tort lawyer that wants in.. contact the defendant through this website.
So how did the defendant get arrested. PC O’Toole only made illegal threats. It is not legal to just phone someone up and tell them not to contact relatives and stuff.. Not legal at all.
Domenic Sinpoli needs to show actual laws to his staffers and let them follow them.
So we know PC O’Toole is not responsible for this wrongful arrest. he is.. but he didn’t seek the warrant etc.
Enter
DC Hudson Norrie.
So the defendant knew he had committed no crime and assumed PC O’Toole was just a close personal friend of Carlo. Carlo works for the Vaughan fire department and has many Vaughan police friends. (maybe even corrupt ones)
But now we get to the next level of incompetence. 11 division.
An odd story… and fun fact. The uncle of the defendant was an 11 division detective back when detectives still asked questions, and he used police resources to track the defendant down in British Columbia to tell him his mother had cancer. The defendant is back in Ontario due to 11 division… little funny. Craig Hilborn was a Staff Sergeant and great detective in the day.
One day the defendant wakes up to this corrupt email from the clearly incompetent (strong opinion backed up by facts) DC Hudson Norrie.
This is the SECOND officer “investigating” this matter. Let’s look at how long his Domenic Sinopoli investigation lasted.
Would you say three sentences or four sentences here? How many sentences should a competent investigation last.. five or six sentences?
No, “Hi how are you” or a single question.
In the very first sentence here.. Mr Norrie clearly introduces himself. This means they had likely never spoken in the past.. as is the fact.
He says the “scathing” email above is his reasoning for the defendant to be arrested in the third sentence.
A Toronto Detective earns $109 000 per year as base salary, and yet we would wager a Starbucks barista could have done a far greater job investigating this case than either PC O’Toole or DC Hudson Norie.
a) would a Starbucks barista learn the complainant was bullying the defendant and his children?
b) would a Starbucks barista learn of the $250 000 motive to feign fear?
c) would a Starbucks barista google the word “consent” if they were as clueless as O’Toole?
d) would a Starbucks barista manufacture butt facts on a synopsis?
e) would a competent investigator learn what communications took place. There are 15 emails to Bisceglia and associates.. not one is included in this fictitious “disclosure”
f) Would a Starbucks barista learn that there was a civil case ongoing?
g) h)… add more as we think of them **********work in progress
Clearly.. we would be better-off hiring minimum wage starbucks baristas to do our justice system justice.
Send suggestions.. How do YOU think a Starbucks barista could have performed this investigation better than Domenic Sinipoli?
Harassment is not about over communication… and if a person has your belongings illegally or you’re involved with court remedies.. Communication is necessary. Again; you cannot steal a car and then have the owner arrested if they ask for their car back. Well… Maybe if you live in West Toronto
What are the known provable facts?
a) Sandra Cirillo, Carlo Cirillo, and Glen Hilborn are going to answer question after question after question about their cruel and obtuse bullying tactics. they are all scheduled to be witnesses at this trial. Do you think they are going to say “no.. we do not possess his grandmother’s letter that they could have mailed for $2 (photocopy and stamp)?
We are going to roast, comedy style, them like pigs on the witness stand as all the questions are relevant for both now and for future. This webpage will be updated with ALL their answers. You want to hear about abuse.. come back.
They cannot lie and say the do not possess that letter… so they are going to be very illuminating witnesses for the defense. each and every witness will admit to being an ass.. or close to it.
“DC hudson Norre are you proud you conduct no questions asked investigations?”
Will he say he is proud of them? We know he is expecting that question now.. so we will approach it from several angles.
There is zero evidence that makes the defendant look dangerous. PC O’Toole can also explain his psychic detective skills on the witness stand. Both DC Hudson Norrie and PC O’Toole are scheduled to be witnesses for the defense.
Roasted on the stand. The defendant is a stand up comedian and youtuber. Any mention of “roasting” is non-violent.
Their testimony on their flawed investigation skills will be amplified by the sheer lack of any viable evidence in this case.
Can PC O’Toole convince you he asked any questions? Can DC Hudson Norrie?
They are probably heroes to Domenic Sinopoli. Get more innocent in our jails (opinion and facetious).
What kind of fucktard police officer cannot get off their fat asses and ask at least one single question… maybe prior to arresting someone totally innocent at the peak of the pandemic.
If this was “he said/she said” the defendant would be screwed. Clearly these police are too incompetent for detective work.. Normally.. It is apparently fine to be a screw-up detective under Domenic Sinopoli.
The police in Toronto are broken.
There is much work still to be done to this website…….
If you are a tort lawyer and want a case where we can prove malicious prosecution.. this may be for you.
ALL IMAGES IN THIS HAVE HAD SANDRA CIRILLO’S PHONE NUMBER EDITED OUT. There are no untruths in this
This website wont be completed until after 2022.
The defendant has been told the crown seeks no jail or fine. This means it is best to just see what happens as the defendant is documenting his entire case.. and we’ll present it.. (win or lose) in all its honest truth. We are fully confident many judges would happily convict with no evidence.. based on previous experiences.
It’s going to be quite hard for that future judge to ignore the fiction of the synopsis coupled with the pathetic investigations, coupled with the severe emotional bullying done by all parties except the SAINTLY defendant.
None of the officers have ever met the defendant.
Continuing saga…
Lets’ see what they do.. will they say this is harassment.. this website?
No. It is not defamatory in any way and truthful with clear evidence.
Is there anyone sane that works in Etobicoke Justice? Maybe not.
We will outline all the truthful actions of all these people
————–
Crowdfunding buttons-landingp/edited photos/3 youtube videos/clone website and lock it online/add drama section/image plug in.
Be the first to comment