We have a case that is 100% in writing. The only proof an etobicoke prosecutor needs to convict Justice Edward kelly of a serious crime. Is all on court records.
Etobicoke police, crown attorneys, and a bonified “judge”… have clearly and with full written proof conflated several terms that have both civilian dictionary and legal definitions.
Example: If a child threatened to tell a teacher if they are bullied. That is not a threat by legal definition.
The wrongful conviction:
A Toronto man was convicted of inviting his child-abusing brother to a consensual fight. The crown and judge clearly did not understand consensual fighting is legal in Canada.
The defendant clearly requested a consensual fight with his brother.
The child abuser was exposing the defendant’s children to the risk of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse. So the defendant wrote his brother a letter stating he was going to sue him for family photos and other items of a personal nature.
It is legal to say these words…. (from actual letter). This case is 100% in writing and proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that Justice Edward Kelly is a criminal.
The defendant said “come”.. which is implied consent should his brother show up for a fisticuffs.
The “court” references below are because these brothers were involved in a civil suit.
Notice that the defendant even dumbed it down.
The defendant wrote “Fighting is allowed if consensual”.
Now to a casual reader.. this may seem clear that the words consensual and consensually were used… along with some effort to dumb it down for his brother.
This defendant was convicted.. of criminal harassment for this singular letter.
Two choices only: The defense can clearly prove this was because the judge was either criminally negligent on the LEGAL (not shorter oxford dictionary) definition of “Harassment”.
OR Justice Edward Kelly convicted an innocent man to protect his own grievous crimes or errors and his colleagues (the provable allegation here)
There is no third option as all proof in writing demonstrates.
Nothing about his case is hearsay or “witnessed”. Prosecutors examining this choice to levy charges against this judge only need ONLY to look at the court transcripts.
This judge cannot UNSAY his decision or court records and neither can the crown who led this judge down a garden path of silliness.
The letter continued.
Now.. Had the Toronto Police (Hudson Norrie), The Crowns (Laurie Ann Gonet/Alexandra Rourke) or the Judge (Edward J Kelly) had researched even a little tiny bit… They would have known you are even allowed to assault someone if they give permission.
The defense used “google home” to try to educate this judge on the true definition of these words. Perhaps the first time google home has testified in open court.
In fact.. “Consent” is right in the criminal code for assault..
Assault
- 265 (1) A person commits an assault when
- (a) without the consent of another person, he applies force intentionally to that other person, directly or indirectly;
“Consent” is a word in our actual criminal code (third word in 265 subsection “a”).
Justice Kelly has ruled that consent is a “conditional threat”.. which is absurd, ridiculous, and highly criminally negligent.
Here is a quote from the crown prosecutor Ms Laurie Ann Gonet that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt she conflated “consent” with a “conditional threat”.
Nope. Consensual fighting is allowed in Canada and we can clearly prove Etobicoke Justice was unaware of that fact.. beyond any reasonable doubt.
The crown prosecutor stated in open court and on public record.
“One of the issues [the defense] raised a number of times specifically about the letter to [the child-abusing brother] was that it contains the words “consent” or a “conditional threat”.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Stupid or criminal Etobicoke crown and judge..
Any legal assistant can tell you consent means consent.. it never has nor will it ever imply conditional threat.
A conditional threat is if you say, ‘give me $100 or I’ll punch your nose’… Physical safety has to be in jeopardy.
Ms Laurie Ann Gonet confessed to several crimes with that statement. She will likely argue it was merely criminal negligence and her lack of education but the entire trial suggests Ms Laurie Ann Gonet mistook civilian definitions with legal definition right at the beginning of this case and made huge efforts to cover her own ass.
And the judge has eagerly thrown his own career under the bus by committing crimes on her behalf.
Justice Edward Kelly seemed moved by these arguments from the crown even though they do not match any level of sane behavior.
https://www.yyccriminaldefence.ca/street-fight-consent/
Everything said here is 100% backed up in writing.
This case finally consisted of one letter and a Facebook posting.. neither of which contained any form of “legal threat”.
Justice Edward Kelly went on record to state that the letter that mentioned consent, consensual, consensually and permission surrounding this legal fight.
was “threatening”.. but how? The REASONING this judge fails to tell us in a 56-paragraph decision void of common sense and legal ethics.
This “tough talk: between brothers is typically called Bravado.
***** add quote from Kelly decision here***************<< editorial note
If your brother was abusing your children for years and years would you think it legal to request a consensual fight from them? It is legal.
ANY HONEST PROSECUTOR LOOKING AT THIS COURT CASE TRANSCRIPTS will find no less than TWO (2) easily provable crimes committed by Ms Laurie Ann Gonet (crown).
This is one of the reasons the judge has tried to prevent the defense from obtaining transcripts of this case. Self-preservation. Justice Kelly wants to keep his actions in thi scase secret.
Justice Kelly willfully chose to expose the defendants innocent children to possible sexual, physical,and emotional abuse (all alleged during the trial) to protect his own criminally negligent behaviors.
From day one of the trial this judge clearly seemed to be in bed with the prosecution and the defense repeatedly told him his actions were unlawful and corrupt.
The defense said this trial was unconstitutional from day one. The judge felt he was omnipotent and immune to the clear rules of law.
Example: This case boiled down to one letter where consensual fighting was mentioned, but the defense was never given this letter in the disclosure. The crown proveably withheld the disclosure on purpose to try to unfairly beat the provably innocent defendant in court.
Guess when the defendant learned the crown was going to bring the actual invitation to a flight to the trial..
When the witness was on the witness stand.
Note: The crown argued that she “forgot” to give the defense all relevant evidence. The disclosure ethe defense team received was so empty a lawyer was not even deemed necessary. Clearly the judge and crown relied heavily on misconstruing this “consent” as a “conditional threat” (The crowns own words).
The crown admitted to knowing the defendant was operating without disclosure since day one of the trial. The defendant thought he made a pretrial error and had been presented it but not seen it.
No..
And Pay attention Shane Hobson… for you will soon be negligent if you do not arrest this crown prosecutor and judge.
Ms Gonet admitted on court record and in a conversation with Justice Kelly that she KNEW .
K-N-E-W… that the defendant was without disclosure for the first three days of the trial.
Which is enough of a confession to place her in prison.
and it is undeniable and on our court recordings
There is too much evidence against them both to ignore for long… and by ignoring Shane Hobson… you expose the defendant’s children to sexual, physical, and emotional abuse.
Justice Edward Kelly decided he would rather expose the defendant’s children to these abuses than do the right thing. The judge participated in the crimes of Ms Laurie Ann Gonet.
NO CANADIAN EVER NEEDS DISCLOSURE.. Thats a myth. You just need to get a criminal ass of a judge who will say “You’re entitled to a fair trial, not a good trial”, and then REWARD the crown for denying the accused his constitutional rights to disclosure which clearly would have added to the pretrial witness list and the defendant’s need for a lawyer.
We suggest the judge was not negligent but instead is intentionally covering the ass of a crown prosecutor he seems overly fond of.. why else would he fail to admonish all her criminal behaviors in this trial.
Not one decision ever went to the defense.
The defense was not allowed the required mistrial due to that missing disclosure. The defendant was not allowed to call witnesses. The defendant was not even allowed to give his summation.
This judge preferred to keep his head in the sand and hear only what he wanted to hear.. in an effort to protect his work mate.
Example: The defense then argued that Ms Laurie Ann Gonet had acted criminally in her failing to give disclosures. PLUS she admitted to the crime on court record.
In FRONT of the criminal (actually a criminal) Justice Kelly.
Is disclosure important?
If you have been charged with a criminal offence, you have the right to receive your “disclosure.” Typically, this occurs before you have to decide whether you want to enter a plea of either guilty or not guilty. This allows an accused to know the case against them and to make an informed decision as to whether or not they want to negotiate a deal or go to trial.
Now not only did the Etobicoke crown not give disclosure.. but the defendant made websites and protest email to the police over lack of disclosure. Which the crown then turned and used against him as fabricated uninvolved evidence.
This case IN THE END.. came down to one (1) letter.
At the start of this sham of a trial the defense told the judge this case would all boil down to one letter and whether consent to a fight was legal.
But no.. in an effort to CRIMINALLY cover up her many errors.. this highly incompetent Etobicoke crown did everything in her power to make this trial lengthy and costly for the defense to order transcripts.
This case boils down to one letter.. which had a competent police officer read.,. would have been deemed legal.
This case is 100% about Etobicoke inability to understand simple laws.
and this case has no “crime” except writing..
The defense argued for a mistrial.
MISTRIAL: If Ms. Gonet was originally correct.. and she has simply “mistaken” (contrary evidence) to send the accused his constitutional right to disclosure. Would you bring a lawyer to court if the crown told you she was bringing no evidence? Nothing from the crowns original disclosure was used in the wrongful conviction.
The judge said,“You’re entitled to a fair trial, not a good trial” and then he went about conducting the most criminally unfair trial in Canadian history.
So.. If youre a crown prosecutor in Canada.. You don’t need to give disclosures..
The defense will make websites teaching this… Canadians are not entitled to good trials.
This is a TEXTBOOK mistrial.
Through no fault of his own the defendant was denied enough disclosure to warrant a decent lawyer in this matter. The defense was unable to arrange witnesses at a pretrial etc.
Not giving the defendant disclosure is a trick Etobicoke crown may use in every case.. this needs to be examined by oversight. As if our courts have oversight.. It needs to occur.
Oversight in this case will be mandatory.
There is enough evidence on court recordings to jail Ms Laurie Ann Gonet and Justice Edward Kelly… and they can SUE ME if they think I say anything publically that is untrue.
For all we know.. Ms Gonet and this judge are a team going around denying all their innocent Canadian victims their constitutional rights.
The defendant made a website ABOUT the lack of disclosure before the case even went to trial… can you imagine being arrested and then receiving a blank and empty disclosure filled only with fictitious police synopsis and other hearsay.
There were clear and prudent JUSTIFICATIONS for a mistrial.
and that would have been the fair course of action.
But NO. This judge was always in bed with the prosecution… and the court records NEED to be ordered by the Etobicoke crown and charges must be levied against both Justice Edward Kelly and his work mate Ms Laurie Ann Gonet.
Witnesses is another example of how the defendant was abused by this man who calls himself a judge.
Without disclosure.. the defense felt no need for character witnesses, etc. or to call the victims of his brother’s abuse to the stand.
The judge purposefully placed his head in the sand to avoid hearing the defendant’s children label him as a well-known pacifist.. something that came up time and again. The defendant has literally written books about pacifism. Did the judge learn that? No.. He willfully remained ignorant because he knew his ruling far in advance of this provable sham of the trial.
No… The only witnesses allowed were for the prosecution.
Shouldn’t a fair judge be in favor of things like “disclosure” and “witnesses”?
Now.. Lets look at just one of the witnesses the corrupt crown called in this case.
The defendant had not spoken to his father in over a decade due to physical and sexual abuse.
But Ms Laurie Ann Gonet brought him onto the witness stand and got him to testify that he felt fear the defendant had left mail in his mailbox… Yes.. it is as ridiculous as it sounds.
Ms Gonet (crown) led her witnesses all around town.. but the defense argued in advance of their testimony the relevance.
This case is about one letter sent the year prior.
If you are reading this as a sane Canadian concerned about our rights…
Think on this.
What value does a witness have who hasn’t witnessed anything?
This was intentional by Ms Laurie Ann Gonet to make this trial lengthy and costly for the defense.. a horrible and despicable and PROVABLE tactic here.
The defense wanted to bring his Judo mentor into court.. His godfather was former Toronto police staff sergeant Craig Hilborn.
Justice Kelly denied the testimony of a former HERO Toronto Police Staff Sergeant who was the defendant’s godfather and Judo mentor.
The defense was not allowed any witnesses.. none relevant. The judge did suspiciously did allow two unrelated employers to testify… but the defense never called them. The defense just wanted to see if the judge was blocking the defense to aid the crown.. and it is provably the case here.
The defense did not want these other two witnesses to testify.. but they were discussed only to prove the judge was fine with additional witnesses as long as they could not aid the defendant’s case.
The judge is still unaware he was fooled into admitting he was prejudiced.
The defense was FINE with this INTENTIONAL sham of a trial as long as the judge ended the abuse against his children.
Bringing a criminal conviction after such a provably bogus trial prove the judge was always in bed with the prosecutor and that no intention of fairness was ever attempted.
The defense argued that a man who had witnessed nothing and who had not seen the defendant in a decade would be a weird and totally negligent witness.
Justice Edward kelly argued it was Ms Laurie Ann Gonets case and she could call whatever witnesses she wished..
He then implied the defense may also one day get to call witnesses.. but that would only occur in a fair non-etobicoke trial.
This was a ie on behalf of Justice Edward Kelly. Justice Edward Kelly provably blocked all relevant witnesses and only allowed prior employers as character witnesses for the defense.
Nothing said in this email is NOT on court record
JUSTICE KELLY STATED IN OPEN COURT THE DEFENDANT WAS CONSIDERED A REASIONABLE PERSON prior to the letter to his brother. Due to a prior situation, the defense promised to litigate at the cost of days. Both the Etobicoke crown and Justice Kelly stated the defendant was considered a reasonable person from the get-go.
**************** add paragraph from decision here (crown concedes)*****
How many innocent canadians are in our jails today because of the inept clown team of Gonet and Kelly?
except clowns are funny.. How many innocent people are in jail right now due to these morons.
If YOU were arrested..
Would you want
a) disclosure
b) relevant witnesses
c) Ability to read your summations
The judge wouldn’t even let the defense make closing arguments.. This is the most highly illegal sham of a trial we know of.. but how many sham trials are hidden from us.
Is someone you know and love in jail due to how our judicial system snowplows its victims.
OVERSIGHT MUST OCCUR HERE.
There is enough evidence of crimes ON COURT RECORD to place both Ms Laurie Ann Gonet and Justice Kelly in jail.
at the VERY LEAST Justice Kelly is criminally negligent but the evidence shows he was always in bed with Ms Lauire Ann Gonet.
Justice Edward J. Kelly never once wanted a fair trial.
You’re looking at ALL the evidence…
Consenting to a fight in Canada is legal.
Disclosure is necessary and this defense team was violated in many ways
Witnesses are normally scheduled at pre-trial unless the crown prosecutor withholds disclosure and pretends she is coming to the trial with no evidence.
This case is all in writing and the crimes the defense accuses Ms Gonet and Jstice Kelly of are all on court record and provable beyond a reasonable doubt
(Attention Shane Hobson – ignoring this case for long will make you a criminal)
You have the evidence to convict a sitting judge TODAY.. if you simply order and HONESTLY review the court transcripts.
Judges can be criminals too.. they are not “special”.. and if you make justice Kelly “special”.. Ill argue it publically for the next 50 years.
This judge clearly conflated consent with “Conditional threat”.
NOTE: WEBSITE IN PROGRESS… I AM NOT POSTING EACH AND EVERY 56 PARAGRAPHS WITH EXPLANATIONS UNTIL AFTER MARCH 30 TH BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN THE NAMES IOF THE ACCUSERS AND THE DEFENSE IS TOO LAZY TO EDIT THEM OUT TODAY…
NOTHING IN THE JUDGES OWN (56 paragraph) DECISION (to be published on this and many websites shortly) CONSTITUTES A CRIME…
The judge may argue it is illegal to PUBLISH information on his brother and sister.. but that is teghTORT this judge is confused about.
Clearly this judge thinks either thinks he is a small claim court TORT judge… or he has gone all in on being a criminal to save the butt of his criminal colleagues.
NOTE:
I PROMISE/VOW to have over a dozen truthful websites about Justice Edward J Kelly..
I PROMISE/VOW to have over a dozen websites about the horrible criminal MS Lauire Ann Gonet
I PROMISE/VOW to have over a dozen websites about my child abusing brother
and they are legal. and you fuckers need to learn that.
The defense had a common theme in all of his writings.. that if his child abusing brother could not do the right thing in regards to many personal effects (civil suit was ongoing) He would simply ask their children for photos in 15 years.
Notice it says 15 years in an august test when Justice Kelly went on the court record and said the accusers admitted to having no fear whatsoever….
This is an email proving that this conversation was almost verbatim to the 15 years that made Justice Edward J. Kelly feign fear in his ORAL (later edited out) decision (Defense misses NOTHING)
——-
This Judge Edward J. Kelly went on court record at lengthy stating why asking the childs abusing brother for family photographs in 15 years was legitimate cause for concern.
IT IS REASONABLE to contact your nephews for copies of family photographs when they are over the age of 29 (15 years)
Can any reader of this find reason to fear if someone said they would contact your children for family photos if you were too much of a mad cow to deliver them originally?
If your house burned to the ground and you lost all family photos..
Would YOU contact relatives to get copies.. as is reasonable?
————
ONCE HONEST PROSECUTORS LOOK AT THIS CASE…
The arrest of Ms Laurie Ann Gonet is imminent..
This judge may be able to claim criminal negligence but he should know things like the definitions of harassment and threat..
NO STUPID ASS ETOBICOKE JUDGE…
A “consent” never was nor will it EVER BE FUCKING CLOSE to a “conditional threat”.
And this judge heard case evidence supporting that.. wow…for like an hour.
not once did this idiot judge ever say..
“What do you mean by conflating consent with conditional threat“..
Justice Kelly bought it hook line and sinker..
He even entertained CASE LAW to that effect.. for over an hour… what a MORON.
and all on the court record in the most sham of a trail in all of Canadian history.
NOTE: I HAVE SPENT A TOTAL OF 4 HOURS ON THIS WEBSITE.. In the future I will copy paste and have many various titles targetting the various Etobicoke villainous partiers.
https://newsnewbs.com/domenic-sinopoli-what-to-do-when-the-toronto-police-become-an-enemy-of-the-people/
^^ PRIOR to this case the story was LENGTHY..
Now I can tell it without even mentioning my brother sister or fathers names or conduct.
Pending.. a dozen websites on the crown ms laurie ann gonet.. websites on hudson norrie..
Website on Shane Hobson to draw his attention in a provable and legal way…
—–
The 56-paragraph RULING
Is void of any crime… or even a cause for concern..
PLEASE TELL US THE CRIME IN THE RULING OR WHY THE JUDGE ADMITTED CONSENT/PERMISSION//CONSENSUAL/CONSENSUALLY.. is a conditional threat
Justice Kelly was fairly warned in advance I will approach this in a civil justice manner and to watch all of his wording.
I FUCKING WARNED HIM TO WATCH HIS WORDS.. and a few rewrites later I have his 56 paragraph confession to idiocy.
A decision void of any crime or reasoning why a defendant would act unreasonable (the Judge said the defendant was reasonable on court record prior to the invitation to a consenting fight)?
The judge suggests the brother had reason to fear.. but why?
From being invited to a consensual fight?
THIS IS ONE HASTILY WRITTEN WEBSITE.. and it is devastating in its conclusions for ms laurie ann gonet and justice Edward j kelly.
NOTE: I invite Justice Kelly or his work mate Lauire Ann Gonet to make truthful websites about the defendant if they wish
The judge credited the defendant as being a reasonable person on court record.. the crown conceded no crimes had been committed prior to that invitation to a consenting fight.
NOTHING IN THE 56 PARAGRPAH DECISION outlines any form of crime?
The judge did go on record saying he felt the defendants plan to contact the child abusers children in 15 year and ask them for family photos was “disturbing”
———–
ThIS Is NoT PaRt of the website… it will be modified to include ALL 56 paragraphs and explain why each and every one of them is reasonable…
Clearly Justice Edward kelly is either too criminally negligent to understand words.. or he has acted out of what he perceived as his duty to protect his corrupt coworker.
(note Gonet… This is my first go.. MY writing is shorter and more concise over time)
Notice I do not need to name myself, my sister, or my dad..
Justice kelly did you zero favors by abusing my children for you.
I am MOTIVATED for truth and justice.. and this is a pretty clear case of criminal working by justice kelly.
forgive typos and such..
When I campaign against you bozo’s all summer long.. I dont need to mention my sisters name. albeit it is 100% legal. so LEARN THE FUCKING LAW YOU TWITS!
I wager I can get ms gonet and justice kelly fired by September 1st.
this part of the website will be removed and I have much more..
I cancopy and paste this website into a zillion online locations if Etobicoke crown tries to censor illegally.
Sadly..
Im a forgiving guy.. but what you assholes are STILL doing to my children is unacceptable.
Hudson Norrie.. are you a proud child abuser/
I NEED
The abuse against my children to end
Canadian people to be safe from corrupt judges like Edward J Kelly
Canadian people to be safe from The Crowns Laurie Ann Gonet and Alexandra Rourke.
I will need Hudson Norrie to move to traffic…
Ms Gonet NEEDS to go to defense or I will campaign for her arrest and removal of her law license’
YOUR BUBBLE CONSISTS OF TWO IGNORAMUSES AND/ORCRIMINALs… Justice Edward kelly and his accomplice
The defense contends the judge edward j kelly willfully chose to place the defendant’s children at risk for future abuse to save his own ass.
MS GONET COMMITTED PROVABLE CRIMES (plural) on court recordings.
Justice Kelly di her zero favors by allowing her to remain after the prosecutorial misconduct accusations. which must also now be appealed.
The defense is PROUD he
Stood up to his child abusing brother by requesting a legal fight.. even if the Justice Kelly was too incompetent to follow the law either by intent or stupidity.
This ANGRY little pathetic judge edward kelly is piecemeal for the truth…
so is the crown he is still in bed with
THESE WEBSITES WILL ALSO BE USED TO BRING APPEAL LAWYERS UP TO SPEED!
Be the first to comment